−⏑−−¦⏑⏑⏑⏑−¦¦⏑−−−¦⏑−⏑− bhavipulā
apramādo amatapadaṁ pramādo maccuno padaṁ |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−⏑−−¦⏑−⏑−
apramattā na mrīyanti I count mr- as not making position here to give the pathyā cadence, otherwise we have mavipulā with an unusual opening. ye pramattā yathā matā ||

−−⏑−¦⏑−−−¦¦−⏑−−¦⏑−⏑−
etaṁ viśeṣataṁ nyāttā apramādamhi paṇḍitā |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑−
apramāde pramodanti ayⁱrāṇāṁ The svarabhakti vowel needs to be ignored to correct the metre. Notice the metathesis ariy- >> ayir- which always occurs in this word in Patna; and that Patna retains the long -ā- vowel before anusvara, cf. also medhāvīṁ 206c; aviñūṁ 285c for instances of other vowels retaining length before anusvara. gocare ratā ||

−−⏑−¦−⏑⏑−¦¦−−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑− bhavipulā
te jhāyino sātatikā niccaṁ dḍhaparākramā |

⏑−⏑−¦−−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑− mavipulā
phusanti dhīrā nibbāṇaṁ yogacchemaṁ In Patna there is sometimes a development of -kṣ- to -cch-, whereas elsewhere (e.g. rukkh-, pakkh-) and in the Pāḷi it has developed to -kkh-. See 19 below for another example. anuttaraṁ ||

⏑−⏑⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑−
pramādam anuyuñjanti bālā dummedhino janā |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−−−¦⏑−⏑−
apramādan tu Patna distinguishes the disjunctive tu as in Sanskrit, which has been assimilated to ca in Pāḷi. medhāvī dhanaṁ śreṣṭhaṁ va rakkhati ||

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑−
apramatto pramattesu suttesu bahujāgaro |

⏑⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
abalāśśam va śīghrāśśo hettā This illustrates the short form of the absolutive in Patna, which has the ending -ttā (see also e.g. vijettā 247a; chettā 361c; pramajjittā 20a; vidittā 134a; acarittā 229a; adhiṣṭhihittā 350b; viśodhayittā 410b; nyāttā 15a; ñāttā 34c; pāttā 348a). yāti sumedhaso ||

⏑−⏑−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑−
pramādam apramādena yadā nudati paṇḍito |

−−−−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−−−¦⏑−⏑−
praṁñāprāsādam āruyha aśoko śokiniṁ prajāṁ |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑−
parvvataṭṭho va bhoma 'ṭṭhe Read bhomaṭṭhe. dhīro bāle avecchati ||

−−−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
pūrvve cāpi pramajjittā yo pacchā na pramajjati |

⏑⏑−−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−⏑−−¦⏑−⏑−
so imaṁ I read sŏ imaṁ here and in the following verses to allow for resolution, which gives an acceptable opening. lokaṁ prabhāseti abhramutto va candramā ||

−−−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
pūrvve cāpi pramajjittā yo pacchā na pramajjati |

⏑⏑−⏑−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑−
so imāṁ visattikāṁ loke sato samativattati ||

−⏑−⏑¦⏑⏑−−¦¦⏑−−⏑¦⏑−⏑− savipulā
apramādagaru bhikkhū pramāde bhayadaṁśino |

⏑−−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑−
abhavvo parihāṇāya nibbāṇasseva santike ||

−⏑−⏑¦⏑⏑−−¦¦⏑−−⏑¦⏑−⏑− savipulā
apramādagaru bhikkhū pramāde bhayadaṁśino

−−⏑⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−−−¦⏑−⏑−
saṁyojanam aṇutthūlaṁ dahaṁ aggīva gacchati |

−⏑−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑−
apramādaratā hotha saṁ cittam This should be written saṁcittaṁ. anurakkhatha ||

−−−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−−−¦⏑−⏑−
duggā uddharathāttānaṁ pake Scribal error, read: paṁke. sanno va kuñjaro |

−⏑−−¦⏑⏑⏑−¦¦⏑⏑−−¦⏑−⏑− navipulā
apramāde pramudino nipakā śīlasaṁvtā ||

−−−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−⏑−−¦⏑−⏑− mavipulā
te ve kālena prācchanti I count pr- as not making position to give the pathyā cadence. yattha prātto na śocati |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑−
apramāde pramodetha na kāmaratisandhave ||

−−⏑⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−⏑−−¦[⏑]−⏑−
evaṁ viharan ātāpī śāntacitto 'nuddhato Although it creates an hiatus, we need to restore the akṣara a- here to correct the metre. |

−−⏑⏑¦⏑⏑⏑−−¦¦−−−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
cetośamatham anuyutto dukkhassantakaro siyā ||

−−−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−⏑⏑¦⏑−⏑−
uṭṭheyā The reading here would seem to confirm that uttiṭṭhe in the Pāḷi should be taken as an optative. na pramajjeyā dhammaṁ sucaritaṁ care |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑−
dhammacārī [sukhaṁ] śeti aśśiṁ This form is normally written assiṁ in Patna, see 67d, 158d, 224d, 225d. loke paramhi ca ||

−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑−¦¦⏑⏑−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑− Vaitālīya x 4
uṭṭhāṇavato satīmato śucikammassa niśāmmakāriṇo |

−⏑−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑−¦¦−⏑−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑− In both the prior and posterior lines we need to count the opening syllable as light to correct the mātra count.
saṁyyatassa ca dhammajīvino apramattassa yaśo 'ssa vaddhati ||

−−−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−⏑−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
uṭṭhāṇenā 'pramādena saṁyyamena damena ca |

−−−−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−−−¦⏑−⏑−
dīpaṁ kayⁱrātha medhāvī yam ogho nādhipūrati ||

−−⏑−¦−⏑,⏑¦−⏑−−¦¦⏑−⏑−,¦−⏑⏑¦−⏑−− Triṣṭubh x 4
uṭṭhāṇakālamhi anuṭṭhihāno yuvā balī ālasiko upoko |

−−⏑−¦−⏑⏑¦−⏑−−¦¦−−⏑−¦−,⏑⏑¦−⏑−−
saṁsannasaṁkappamano kusīdo praṁñāya māggaṁ alaso na yeti ||

−−−−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑−−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
hīnaṁ dhammaṁ na seveyā pramādena na samvase |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦⏑⏑−−¦⏑−⏑−
micchadṣṭiṁ na seveyā na siyā lokavaddhano ||

⏑−⏑−¦−⏑⏑−¦¦−⏑−⏑¦⏑−⏑− bhavipulā
na tāvatā dhammadharo yāvatā bahu bhāṣati |

−⏑−−¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−−¦⏑−⏑−
yo tu appam pi sottāna This is the alternative form of the absolutive in Patna, ending -ttāna; cf. also chettāna 134c, 144c; prahattāna 159c; śottāna 275c. dhammaṁ kāyena phassaye Evidently the Patna reading employing the optative is to be preferred here as the Pāḷi hardly makes sense. |

⏑−−⏑¦⏑−−−¦¦−−−⏑¦⏑−⏑−
sa ve dhammadharo hoti yo dhamme na pramajjati ||

−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑−−¦¦−−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑−− Aupacchandasaka x 4
dhammaṁ vicinātha apramattā I can find no parallel to this line in the Pāḷi texts. mā vo kāmaguṇā bhrameṁsu cittaṁ |

−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑−−¦¦−−−⏑⏑¦−⏑−⏑−−
mā lohaguḍe gilaṁ pramatto kraṇḍe dukkham idan ti dayhamāno The metre is problematic in the Pāḷi here, something that is overcome in Patna by making mā modify kraṇḍe alone. ||