Kāyānupassanā

Navasīvathikapabbaṁ This heading is only found in ChS (though there given as -sivathika-. The titles given below, starting with Paṭhamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ have been extracted from the end-titles in BJT.

Paṭhamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya ChS: sivathikāya, and so throughout; BJT: sivathikāya; sīvathikāya elsewhere. chaḍḍitaṁ, ekāhamataṁ vā dvīhamataṁ vā tīhamataṁ vā, uddhumātakaṁ vinīlakaṁ vipubbakajātaṁ. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ChS: evaṁanatīto, and so throughout. ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati.

Evam-pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Paṭhamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Dutiyaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, BJT: chaḍḍītaṁ, printer’s error; correct elsewhere. kākehi vā khajjamānaṁ, kulalehi vā khajjamānaṁ, gijjhehi vā khajjamānaṁ, sunakhehi vā khajjamānaṁ, ONLY: gijjhehi vā khajjamānaṁ, kulalehi vā khajjamānaṁ (reversing the order of the other editions), suvānehi vā khajjamānaṁ; PTS: supāṇehi vā khajjamānaṁ. sigālehi vā khajjamānaṁ, vividhehi vā pāṇakajātehi khajjamānaṁ. ChS has an expanded list: kākehi vā khajjamānaṁ kulalehi vā khajjamānaṁ gijjhehi vā khajjamānaṁ kaṅkehi (herons) vā khajjamānaṁ sunakhehi vā khajjamānaṁ byagghehi (tigers) vā khajjamānaṁ dīpīhi (leopards) vā khajjamānaṁ siṅgālehi vā khajjamānaṁ vividhehi vā pāṇakajātehi khajjamānaṁ. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī ONLY printed bhāvī above, but from here onwards prints bhāvi, further cases will not be noted. etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati.

Evam-pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Dutiyaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Tatiyaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhisaṅkhalikaṁ ChS: aṭṭhikasaṅkhalikaṁ, and so throughout; BJT prints aṭṭhikaṅkhalikaṁ here, but aṭṭhisaṅkhalikaṁ elsewhere. samaṁsalohitaṁ nahārusambaddhaṁ. ChS: nhārusambandhaṁ, and so throughout. PTS, ONLY: -sambandhaṁ, and so throughout. PTS abbreviates this section and the next 3 sections in such a way that it is difficult to reconstruct the text. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī BJT: evambhāvī. BJT wavers in the spelling of this word; evaṁbhāvī (with niggahīta) has been adopted as standard here. etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Tatiyaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Catutthaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhisaṅkhalikaṁ nimmaṁsaṁ lohitamakkhitaṁ nahārusambaddhaṁ. ChS: nimaṁsalohitamakkhitaṁ (however, the prefix is nis- in nimmaṁsa [not ni-] so we need a double consonant in line with the rules of assimilation); ONLY: nimmaṁsalohitamakkhitaṁ. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati: ChS: upasamharati, by mistake.

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho BJT omits kho by mistake., bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Catutthaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Pañcamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhisaṅkhalikaṁ apagatamaṁsalohitaṁ nahārusambaddhaṁ. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu ONLY prints bhikkhu here against its normal practice of printing bhikkhū. kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Pañcamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Chaṭṭhaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhikāni apagatasambandhāni, disāvidisāsu ChS: disā vidisā (sic); literally: scattered in the main and intermediate directions. vikkhittāni, ONLY: apagata nahāru sambandhāni disāvidisāsu-vikkhittāni (sic). aññena hatthaṭṭhikaṁ, aññena pādaṭṭhikaṁ, aññena jaṅghaṭṭhikaṁ, aññena ūruṭṭhikaṁ, PTS: ūraṭṭhikaṁ. aññena kaṭaṭṭhikaṁ, aññena piṭṭhiṭṭhakaṁ, PTS: piṭṭhikaṇṭhakaṁ. aññena sīsakaṭāhaṁ. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā PTS omits vā, printer’s error. kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, PTS: mattāyo, printer’s error. anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho, BJT omits kho again here by mistake; and at the end of the next 3 sections. bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Chaṭṭhaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Sattamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhikāni setāni saṅkhavaṇṇupanibhāni. ChS: saṅkhavaṇṇapaṭibhāgāni; the meaning is the same; PTS: saṇkha-(sic)-vaṇṇūpanibhāni; and again abbreviates this and the following two sections. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Sattamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Aṭṭhamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhikāni puñjakitāni BJT: puñjīkatāni. terovassikāni. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho, bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Aṭṭhamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Navamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ

Puna ca paraṁ, bhikkhave, bhikkhu seyyathā pi passeyya sarīraṁ sīvathikāya chaḍḍitaṁ, aṭṭhikāni ONLY: aṭṭhikānī, printer’s error, correct elsewhere. pūtīni cuṇṇakajātāni. So imam-eva kāyaṁ upasaṁharati:

“Ayam-pi kho kāyo evaṁdhammo evaṁbhāvī etaṁ anatīto” ti.

Iti ajjhattaṁ ONLY: ajjahattaṁ, printer’s error, correct elsewhere. vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, bahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, ajjhattabahiddhā vā kāye kāyānupassī viharati, samudayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, vayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, samudayavayadhammānupassī vā kāyasmiṁ viharati, “atthi kāyo” ti vā panassa sati paccupaṭṭhitā hoti yāvad-eva ñāṇamattāya patissatimattāya, anissito ca viharati, na ca kiñci loke upādiyati. Evam-pi kho, PTS: evaṁ kho here, and from here forward, against its previous practice of writing evam pi and omitting kho. bhikkhave, bhikkhu kāye kāyānupassī viharati.

(Navamaṁ Sīvathikaṁ)

Cuddasa Kāyānupassanā Niṭṭhitā ChS, ONLY omit.

last updated: October 2011 (audio added November 2014)